Sam Bankman-Fried pushes for retrial, claims prosecutors pressured witnesses

Sam Bankman-Fried has resurfaced on social media with fresh allegations about the conduct of US prosecutors during his criminal trial.

The FTX founder claims that new evidence shows officials within the Biden administration’s Department of Justice pressured witnesses, either discouraging them from speaking or pressuring them to alter their testimony.

His posts on X come as his appeals and post-conviction motions continue to move through the courts.

Bankman-Fried is serving a lengthy federal prison sentence after his 2023 conviction on multiple fraud and conspiracy charges linked to the collapse of FTX.

He is now asking the court to revisit both the trial process and the judge who presided over it.

SBF

@SBF_FTX

·Follow

New evidence shows that Biden’s DOJ threatened multiple witnesses into silence or into changing their testimony. My conviction should be thrown out.
Judge Lewis Kaplan should recuse himself from this motion. Given his pattern of prejudging defendants—including me, @rsalame7926,

4:02 pm · 11 Feb 2026

339

Read 280 replies

Claims of witness pressure

In his post on X, Bankman-Fried argued that the Department of Justice threatened multiple witnesses into silence or encouraged them to change their statements.

He described this as new evidence that, in his view, undermines the fairness of the proceedings.

According to him, such conduct would invalidate the trial and justify overturning the conviction.

He framed the issue as one of due process, claiming that interference with witness testimony compromised the integrity of the case presented to the jury.

At this stage, those allegations remain unproven. No court has yet accepted his claims or ruled that prosecutorial misconduct occurred.

Call for judge’s recusal

Bankman-Fried also called for US District Judge Lewis Kaplan to step aside from ruling on the matter.

He accused the judge of prejudging defendants and stacking proceedings against him.

In his remarks, he cited what he described as similar treatment toward former FTX executive Ryan Salame and US President Donald Trump.

He argued that this pattern raised concerns about impartiality.

Judge Kaplan oversaw the original trial that led to Bankman-Fried’s conviction. Any decision on recusal would depend on whether the court finds sufficient grounds to question neutrality.

Appeal strategy widens

The social media posts align with recent legal filings seeking a new trial.

His defence has argued that jurors were denied access to exculpatory evidence and that the court improperly restricted witness testimony.

Lawyers have previously contended that key evidence relating to FTX’s internal operations and its bankruptcy process was excluded. They say this limited his ability to present a complete defence.

Sam Bankman-Fried pushes for retrial, claims prosecutors pressured witnesses

Claims of witness pressure

Call for judge’s recusal

Appeal strategy widens

Backlash on X

Related News

Why did Kraft Heinz suddenly hit pause on its breakup plan?

India’s gold market faces headwinds despite Titan’s festive sales surge

US jobs report surprises with 130,000 hires in January as rate cut hopes fade